Overblog
Edit post Follow this blog Administration + Create my blog
The Adventures of Blake and Mortimer

New inked panel from The Will of William S. and new plot details from Blake & Mortimer 25 revealed

Nearly a year before the publication, end 2016, of The Will of William S., the new installment in the series by Yves Sente and André Juillard, Ryun Reuchamps has revealed today in her Twitter account a new inked panel from the album. In it we can find many characters already seen in page 9, who seem to be within some kind of intriging celebration; from the graphic point of view, uthe more extracts we know from the album, the more it looks like it will be Juillard's best album in the series so far, given how greatly he masters the characters and the backgrounds (even more than in The Staff of Plutarch, which was a quite remarkable album, nonetheless). Concerning another matter, according to BD Zoom, Blake & Mortimer 25 (the yet-to-be-titled installment by scriptwriters Jean-Louis Bocquet & Jean-Luc Fromental and cartoonist Antoine Aubin, out in 2017) will take place in Berlin deep within the wide-scale conflicts that took place during the last century. The two coming years are looking quite, quite promissing...

New inked panel from The Will of William S. and new plot details from Blake & Mortimer 25 revealed

Share this post

Repost0

Comment on this post

H
Just want to say a big Thanks, for running this site!<br /> Its great to have a place to go and check for something new, now and then;-)<br /> Like You wrote, the news so far looks promising!<br /> Its a nice feeling having this to look forward to!<br /> <br /> Kind regards/ Hokan
Reply
M
Great to hear such kind words, Hokan, thank you so much! :)<br /> Indeed and, as more from the album keeps coming in, it just looks more and more promising... Juillard and Sente are just going to nail it...<br /> Regards and thank you for reading,<br /> Miguel Frognier.
F
You effed something up in the translation: There's a spanish phrase there in the middle of the post.
Reply
M
Thanks a lot for pointing it out, I have just corrected it.